Two Accounts for the Moral Wrongness of Torture - 2224 Words

Torture is morally wrong because it can affect an individual physically, socially and psychologically. This essay will address the physical affects and psychological affects towards people. Torture is unacceptable because is damages a person’s humanity, values, respect and reputation of the moral authorities. This essay will discuss two accounts for the moral wrongness of torture and they have been discovered by William Twining’s and from his research he noted torture to be morally wrong since the rights of the victim is violated, secondly David Sussman who believes torture is morally wrong because the victim is turned against the victim herself. Torture includes forcing the victim to 1)perform sexual activities, or pose in a sexual manner , 2)beatings and burns 3) placing hoods over the head and covering the eyes by using duct tape 4)and waterboarding. Waterboarding is the most commonly used for torture in nowadays, this method involves placing a cloth over the victims face and causes the victim to experience the sensation of drowning. Torture may affect someone’s life socially because the individual shall find it hard to make friends, difficult to adapt to a new culture and they will feel uncertain and lost about the future (Gerrity et al 2001). Unfortunately torture will also make the victim feel guilty and ashamed about themselves because of the humiliation they have experienced. Lastly, the psychological symptoms impact the victim which includes anxiety, moodShow MoreRelatedMoral Judgements Are Morally Wrong?2025 Words   |  9 Pagesis an area of philosophy that deals with what is morally right and what is morally wrong behavior. Inside of ethics, there are two major views of thinking when making choices about different principles. Deontology is the idea that choices should be made based on obeying moral norms. Moral judgements are contained in an act alone. A deontologist would decide on the moral worth of an action based on the intention of the action. Immanuel Kant, an eighteenth century German philosopher, is consideredRead MoreEthics : Inventing Right And Wrong1865 Words   |  8 Pagesobjective values.† Mackie holds that moral judgements are beliefs and that moral statements are propositions, meaning that they are capable of being true or false. However, for Mackie, all such propositions are false, and thus one is in error about what they are actually claiming. In this paper I will summarize two of Mackie’s arguments for why we should accept error theory: the argument from relativity and the argument from queerness. I will then explain two possible positions error theory leavesRead MoreAn Analysis of Nagels Personal Rights and Public Spaces2240 Words   |  9 PagesIntroduction: This paper will accomplish two tasks. First, it will briefly outline the main points of Thomas Nagel’s argument in â€Å"Personal Rights and Public Space†. Secondly, it will examine and discuss the portion of his argument that I find to be the most problematic. 1. In his paper Nagel argues that rights are not merely self-evident and therefore do require some good arguments to ground them. He aims to establish that rights are justified by the status theory. We will come to see what heRead MoreA Modern Controversy: the Case of George Tiller Essay8892 Words   |  36 Pagesthe Case of George Tiller To some anti-abortionists George Tiller, who was shot dead on Sunday, was a mass murderer known as Tiller the Killer. To his patients and many pro-choice supporters, he was a hero committed to women in need of help. For two decades, Dr Tiller spent his life looking over his shoulder. He had become a lightning rod for anti-abortion activists and in 1993 survived an attempt on his life. He rarely talked about his work for fear of attacks against himself or his family. DrRead MoreAnimal Rights and Human Wrongs6049 Words   |  25 Pagesstrong, as som e peop le supp ose, to lead us to be veg etarians and to se riously curtail, if not eliminate, our use of non-human animals in `scientific experiments designed to benefit us? To fully ap preciate this question let me contrast it with two different ones: Are there limits on how we can legitimately treat rocks? And: are there limits on how we can legitima tely treat other human beings? The an swer to th e first ques tion is pre suma bly `No. Well, thats not q uite right. There are somRead MoreCriticisms Against Ethical Theories8474 Words   |  34 Pagesgood) can be something like the happiness of all people or the spreading of peace and safety. Anythi ng which contributes to that goal is right and anything which does not is wrong. Actions are thought to have no moral value in themselves (no rightness or wrongness), but only get moral value from whether or not they lead to the goal. John Stuart Mill was a famous consequentialist. Consequentialists would say that killing people is not right or wrong in itself, it depends on the outcome. Killing an